Lesson 6 of 6 · Band 8 target · Reading · 20 min · +40 XP

Protect your accuracy under time pressure

Make accurate decisions about difficult claims and use a practical recovery routine during a timed test.

Every little practice counts

Level 1 0 XP

0 / 200 XP
0 day streak Best: 0 days
  1. Mon, Sep 14: no completion
  2. Tue, Sep 15: no completion
  3. Wed, Sep 16: no completion
  4. Thu, Sep 17: no completion
  5. Fri, Sep 18: no completion
  6. Sat, Sep 19: no completion
  7. Sun, Sep 20: no completion
0 lessons complete 0 daily challenges solved Make today count →
Your badges & how to earn XP
  • First step Complete your first lesson or daily challenge. Keep going
  • Week in motion Practise on seven consecutive UTC days. Keep going
  • Course finisher Complete every lesson in any course. Keep going
  • Four-skill explorer Complete an IELTS lesson in listening, reading, speaking, and writing. Keep going

Earn 40 XP for each new lesson, 100 bonus XP for finishing a course, and 15 XP for solving the daily question. Finish a new lesson or daily question to build your streak. Days reset at 00:00 UTC. XP levels track practice, not IELTS bands.

Progress belongs to this browser session and expires with it. Keep using the same browser to continue your journey.

Your exam technique

Locate evidence → test every part of the claim → move on when stuck → return and check.

Give difficult questions a limit

Academic Reading gives sixty minutes for the whole test. A roughly twenty-minute budget per passage can be a starting practice plan, but adapt it to difficulty and your own results. When a question stops yielding new evidence, mark it to return to and move on. Leave time to check unanswered items and completion instructions.

Check scope and comparison

Before deciding that a claim matches, inspect words such as all, most, only, before, and more than. A study in two centres cannot automatically support a claim about every centre. A comparison also needs evidence for both sides. Treat an unmentioned explanation as missing information, not automatically as a contradiction.

Review the decision that failed

After a timed practice, record your chosen answer, the evidence, and the exact word or inference that led you astray. Separate language gaps from time-management problems. Rework the decision slowly, then apply the same check to a different passage. Simply repeating a familiar test can hide the original weakness.

See it in practice

Starting point

Text: The service improved in two pilot centres. Claim: It improved in every centre nationwide. → True

Using this skill

The pilot result does not establish a nationwide result. Look for further evidence before choosing True, False, or Not Given.

The claim changes the population being described. Limited evidence does not settle a broader claim by itself.

Reading practice

A pilot with boundaries

Two local centres introduced a shared appointment system. In both centres, average waiting times fell during the three-month trial. Neither centre changed its number of staff. The evaluation did not compare the centres with services outside the trial. Its authors recommended a wider study before claiming that the system would work equally well throughout the country.

01 / Check your understanding

Try the skill

Choose an answer for each question. You can try again after reading the feedback.

1. The trial centres employed more staff during the trial.
2. Waiting times at centres outside the trial also fell.

02 / Put it into words

Make it your own

Explain the distinction between the two answers. Then write your routine for a question that takes too long and one error-log entry you could reuse in a later test.

Write at least 50 words. Use the checklist and example to review your work; this exercise does not give an automatic IELTS score.

0 / 50 words minimum Save your response with the button below.

Before you finish

  • I checked who and where each claim describes.
  • I distinguished contradiction from missing evidence.
  • I planned when to move on and how to review.
Read one possible response

Compare the choices this writer made with your own. Many different responses can work.

The staffing claim is false because staff numbers did not change. The result outside the trial is not given because the passage reports only the pilot centres. When I cannot find new evidence, I will mark the question and return after answering others. My error log will remind me to check the population in a claim before extending a limited finding to other places.

Earn 40 XP once by answering all questions correctly, reaching the response minimum, and reviewing your work.